Greetings,
On 5/9/26 12:55 AM, Joao Marcos Costa via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
Hello,
On 5/8/26 21:09, Dmitry Baryshkov via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
(...)
We are fetching the source basing on the PV. The patch might be
applicable or might not. I'd suggest listing the patch twice: in the
u-boot_2026.04.bb and u-boot-tools_2026.04.bb.
(in fact I did that in a local patch, it's good that I checked the ML
before sending it).
I agree with this approach. Also, even if someone does not like seeing
the same patch applied in two different recipes, the patch was already
merged upstream and should be available in v2026.05 (I hope?). So, in
any case, we will drop it soon enough.
Any update on this patch?
Building u-boot-tools on master for the "qemuriscv64" machine is still
broken.
For people facing this too, a workaround is the add back
"libyaml-native" to depends in meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common.inc
How come the autobuilder didn't catch this issue on one of our
officially supported machines?
Cheers
Michael.
--
Root Commit
Embedded Linux Training and Consulting
https://rootcommit.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#237260):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/237260
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119204092/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
