Le mar. 30 juin 2026 à 08:42, Richard Purdie < [email protected]> a écrit :
> On Tue, 2026-06-30 at 00:44 +0200, Yoann Congal wrote: > > On Tue Jun 2, 2026 at 5:00 PM CEST, Richard Purdie via > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > > The "public-domain" code has a MIT license header so we can remove > > > that from LICENSE (MIT is already listed). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear_2025.89.bb | 3 ++- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear_2025.89.bb > b/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear_2025.89.bb > > > index 957a0901fb0..ece065265ff 100644 > > > --- a/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear_2025.89.bb > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear_2025.89.bb > > > @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ SECTION = "console/network" > > > > > > # some files are from other projects and have others license terms: > > > # public domain, OpenSSH 3.5p1, OpenSSH3.6.1p2, PuTTY > > > -LICENSE = "MIT & BSD-3-Clause & BSD-2-Clause & PD" > > > +# The 'public-domain' file is headered as MIT > > > +LICENSE = "MIT & BSD-3-Clause & BSD-2-Clause" > > > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > "file://LICENSE;md5=25cf44512b7bc8966a48b6b1a9b7605f" > > > > While reviewing backporting this patch for scarthgap, I've look at the > > licences of dropbear: > > The "'public-domain' file headered as MIT" is (I think): > > https://github.com/mkj/dropbear/blob/DROPBEAR_2026.91/src/curve25519.c > > (indeed MIT header) > > > > But: > > * vendored libtommcrypt is "PD OR WTFPL" > > > https://github.com/mkj/dropbear/blob/DROPBEAR_2026.91/libtomcrypt/LICENSE > > * vendored libtommath is "Unlicense" > > > https://github.com/mkj/dropbear/blob/DROPBEAR_2026.91/libtommath/LICENSE > > ... is that OK that those don't appear in LICENSE? > > > > If yes, then the argument is still valid for scarthgap and I'll will > > backport. > > Well spotted, I think you're right that I didn't get this quite right. > It should be: > > "MIT & BSD-3-Clause & BSD-2-Clause & (PD | WTFPL) & Unlicense" > > assuming those libs are always used in the build. > > We should probably just make it: > > "MIT & BSD-3-Clause & BSD-2-Clause & WTFPL & Unlicense" > > since PD just causes us pain and WTFPL is effectively the alternative. > Ok, I'll drop that for scarthgap for now, send a fix for master and then, look backporting this. Thanks! > > Cheers, > > Richard > > -- Yoann Congal Smile ECS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#239860): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/239860 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119612688/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
