On Tue Jun 30, 2026 at 9:34 AM CEST, Yoann Congal wrote: > Le mar. 30 juin 2026 à 08:42, Richard Purdie < > [email protected]> a écrit : > >> On Tue, 2026-06-30 at 00:44 +0200, Yoann Congal wrote: >> > On Tue Jun 2, 2026 at 5:00 PM CEST, Richard Purdie via >> lists.openembedded.org wrote: >> > > The "public-domain" code has a MIT license header so we can remove >> > > that from LICENSE (MIT is already listed). >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> >> > > --- >> > > meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear_2025.89.bb | 3 ++- >> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > > >> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear_2025.89.bb >> b/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear_2025.89.bb >> > > index 957a0901fb0..ece065265ff 100644 >> > > --- a/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear_2025.89.bb >> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear_2025.89.bb >> > > @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ SECTION = "console/network" >> > > >> > > # some files are from other projects and have others license terms: >> > > # public domain, OpenSSH 3.5p1, OpenSSH3.6.1p2, PuTTY >> > > -LICENSE = "MIT & BSD-3-Clause & BSD-2-Clause & PD" >> > > +# The 'public-domain' file is headered as MIT >> > > +LICENSE = "MIT & BSD-3-Clause & BSD-2-Clause" >> > > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = >> "file://LICENSE;md5=25cf44512b7bc8966a48b6b1a9b7605f" >> > >> > While reviewing backporting this patch for scarthgap, I've look at the >> > licences of dropbear: >> > The "'public-domain' file headered as MIT" is (I think): >> > https://github.com/mkj/dropbear/blob/DROPBEAR_2026.91/src/curve25519.c >> > (indeed MIT header) >> > >> > But: >> > * vendored libtommcrypt is "PD OR WTFPL" >> > >> https://github.com/mkj/dropbear/blob/DROPBEAR_2026.91/libtomcrypt/LICENSE >> > * vendored libtommath is "Unlicense" >> > >> https://github.com/mkj/dropbear/blob/DROPBEAR_2026.91/libtommath/LICENSE >> > ... is that OK that those don't appear in LICENSE? >> > >> > If yes, then the argument is still valid for scarthgap and I'll will >> > backport. >> >> Well spotted, I think you're right that I didn't get this quite right. >> It should be: >> >> "MIT & BSD-3-Clause & BSD-2-Clause & (PD | WTFPL) & Unlicense" >> >> assuming those libs are always used in the build. >> >> We should probably just make it: >> >> "MIT & BSD-3-Clause & BSD-2-Clause & WTFPL & Unlicense" >> >> since PD just causes us pain and WTFPL is effectively the alternative. >> > > Ok, I'll drop that for scarthgap for now, send a fix for master and then, > look backporting this.
master fix: https://lore.kernel.org/openembedded-core/[email protected]/T/#u > > Thanks! > > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> -- Yoann Congal Smile ECS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#239897): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/239897 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119612688/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
