On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:36 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Matthew McClintock <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc | 2 +- >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runtime.inc | 2 ++ >>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc | 9 +++++++++ >>>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc >>>> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc >>>> index 020e21b..32545eb 100644 >>>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc >>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc >>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >>>> require gcc-common.inc >>>> >>>> -PR = "r25" >>>> +PR = "r26" >>>> >>>> # Third digit in PV should be incremented after a minor release >>>> # happens from this branch on gcc e.g. currently its 4.6.0 >>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runtime.inc >>>> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runtime.inc >>>> index 34bfaeb..a7d478c 100644 >>>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runtime.inc >>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runtime.inc >>>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ EXTRA_OECONF_PATHS = " \ >>>> --with-build-sysroot=${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}" >>>> >>>> RUNTIMETARGET = "libssp libstdc++-v3" >>>> +RUNTIMETARGET_append_powerpc = " libgomp" >>>> +RUNTIMETARGET_append_powerpc64 = " libgomp" >>>> # ? >>>> # libiberty >>>> # libmudflap >>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc >>>> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc >>>> index feb8735..001a444 100644 >>>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc >>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc >>>> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ PACKAGES = "\ >>>> libgfortran-dev \ >>>> libmudflap \ >>>> libmudflap-dev \ >>>> + libgomp \ >>>> + libgomp-dev \ >>>> " >>>> # The base package doesn't exist, so we clear the recommends. >>>> RRECOMMENDS_${PN}-dbg = "" >>>> @@ -61,3 +63,10 @@ FILES_libmudflap-dev = "\ >>>> ${libdir}/libmudflap*.a \ >>>> ${libdir}/libmudflap*.la" >>>> >>>> +FILES_libgomp = "${libdir}/libgomp*.so.*" >>>> +FILES_libgomp-dev = "\ >>>> + ${libdir}/libgomp*.so \ >>>> + ${libdir}/libgomp*.a \ >>>> + ${libdir}/libgomp*.la \ >>>> + ${libdir}/libgomp.spec \ >>>> + ${libdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/include/omp.h" >>> >>> Did you build a non ppc architecture to verify that it does not >>> complain about empty packages ? >> >> I tested without the powerpc overrides first... > > OK let me put it differently remove > > +RUNTIMETARGET_append_powerpc = " libgomp" > +RUNTIMETARGET_append_powerpc64 = " libgomp" > > and leave the rest of patch in > > then build for powerpc
That's what I'm saying I did... I did not even get libgomp packages (rpm's) in this scenario.... -M > >> >> -M >> >>> >>>> -- >>>> 1.7.10 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
