On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:26 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:36 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Matthew McClintock <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <[email protected]> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc | 2 +- >>>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runtime.inc | 2 ++ >>>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc | 9 +++++++++ >>>>>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc >>>>>> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc >>>>>> index 020e21b..32545eb 100644 >>>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc >>>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc >>>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >>>>>> require gcc-common.inc >>>>>> >>>>>> -PR = "r25" >>>>>> +PR = "r26" >>>>>> >>>>>> # Third digit in PV should be incremented after a minor release >>>>>> # happens from this branch on gcc e.g. currently its 4.6.0 >>>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runtime.inc >>>>>> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runtime.inc >>>>>> index 34bfaeb..a7d478c 100644 >>>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runtime.inc >>>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-runtime.inc >>>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ EXTRA_OECONF_PATHS = " \ >>>>>> --with-build-sysroot=${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}" >>>>>> >>>>>> RUNTIMETARGET = "libssp libstdc++-v3" >>>>>> +RUNTIMETARGET_append_powerpc = " libgomp" >>>>>> +RUNTIMETARGET_append_powerpc64 = " libgomp" >>>>>> # ? >>>>>> # libiberty >>>>>> # libmudflap >>>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc >>>>>> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc >>>>>> index feb8735..001a444 100644 >>>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc >>>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-package-runtime.inc >>>>>> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ PACKAGES = "\ >>>>>> libgfortran-dev \ >>>>>> libmudflap \ >>>>>> libmudflap-dev \ >>>>>> + libgomp \ >>>>>> + libgomp-dev \ >>>>>> " >>>>>> # The base package doesn't exist, so we clear the recommends. >>>>>> RRECOMMENDS_${PN}-dbg = "" >>>>>> @@ -61,3 +63,10 @@ FILES_libmudflap-dev = "\ >>>>>> ${libdir}/libmudflap*.a \ >>>>>> ${libdir}/libmudflap*.la" >>>>>> >>>>>> +FILES_libgomp = "${libdir}/libgomp*.so.*" >>>>>> +FILES_libgomp-dev = "\ >>>>>> + ${libdir}/libgomp*.so \ >>>>>> + ${libdir}/libgomp*.a \ >>>>>> + ${libdir}/libgomp*.la \ >>>>>> + ${libdir}/libgomp.spec \ >>>>>> + ${libdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/include/omp.h" >>>>> >>>>> Did you build a non ppc architecture to verify that it does not >>>>> complain about empty packages ? >>>> >>>> I tested without the powerpc overrides first... >>> >>> OK let me put it differently remove >>> >>> +RUNTIMETARGET_append_powerpc = " libgomp" >>> +RUNTIMETARGET_append_powerpc64 = " libgomp" >>> >>> and leave the rest of patch in >>> >>> then build for powerpc >> >> That's what I'm saying I did... I did not even get libgomp packages >> (rpm's) in this scenario.... > > OK, Dont you get warnings about empty packages.
Let me double check.... it does not seem to have any such messages: $ bitbake -c cleanall gcc-runtime $ bitbake gcc-runtime $ grep libgomp -r tmp/cooker.log.20120706190* With your changes above starting from scratch with a PR bump for kicks does not even make the packages. -M _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
