On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 27, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Darren Hart <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> kernel.bbclass is a common class for many different kernel versions, >>> and as such the default module_autoload and module_conf values that >>> it contains are not relevant, or out of date for most builds. >>> >>> Individual kernel recipes or distros can better specify these >>> values to meet their needs. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> >> >> This makes sense to me. None of the below are likely to prevent boot and >> seem to be more along the lines of MACHINE policy. >> > > This needs some soak time. For folks who are unknowingly depending on this.
Is there a good place to stage this to get more eyes on it ? I'm willing to help make sure no one is broken, but I'm @ 6 days and got a few comments, but nothing much .. so if we can do more, I'm all ears! Cheers, Bruce > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
