On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Jul 27, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Darren Hart <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> kernel.bbclass is a common class for many different kernel versions, >>>> and as such the default module_autoload and module_conf values that >>>> it contains are not relevant, or out of date for most builds. >>>> >>>> Individual kernel recipes or distros can better specify these >>>> values to meet their needs. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> >>> >>> This makes sense to me. None of the below are likely to prevent boot and >>> seem to be more along the lines of MACHINE policy. >>> >> >> This needs some soak time. For folks who are unknowingly depending on this. > > Is there a good place to stage this to get more eyes on it ? I'm willing to > help > make sure no one is broken, but I'm @ 6 days and got a few comments, but > nothing much .. so if we can do more, I'm all ears! >
Well I fixed my case :) > Cheers, > > Bruce > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > -- > "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await > thee at its end" > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
