On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 17:42 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > Adapt the recipes to fetch a tarball. > Tarball is generated from latest 2.16 branch > which has e500-math_private.patch already applied > hence we remove that patch. > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > > What the motivation to move to the tarball?
svn:// recipes depend on subversion-native. Having switched to the new ubversion version, we've in a nasty position of it being hard to ASSUME_PROVIDED with the API breakage. Building subversion-native is a pain and delays the core part of the build significantly. Switching to tarball recipes should improve our build speed a lot. So its mainly for performance reasons that we should do this. My only question is whether we need to include the svn revision in the tarball name? Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
