On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Richard Purdie < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 17:42 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > Adapt the recipes to fetch a tarball. > > Tarball is generated from latest 2.16 branch > > which has e500-math_private.patch already applied > > hence we remove that patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> > > > > What the motivation to move to the tarball? > > svn:// recipes depend on subversion-native. Having switched to the new > ubversion version, we've in a nasty position of it being hard to > ASSUME_PROVIDED with the API breakage. > > Building subversion-native is a pain and delays the core part of the > build significantly. Switching to tarball recipes should improve our > build speed a lot. > > So its mainly for performance reasons that we should do this. > > My only question is whether we need to include the svn revision in the > tarball name? > Yes please do or it is a nightmare to track it back to a revision. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
