On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Tomas Frydrych <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On 15/05/13 15:09, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> Can you not just get the appropriate changes into the BSP layers >> so that when you add the BSP on top of OE-Core it does just work "out of the >> box"? > > What you are really saying is that the onus of maintaining working > clutter packages should be on the BSP maintainers. I have already > explained previously in this thread why I don't think this is going to > work out in practice, so I am not going to repeat myself again. > > >> If clutter is taken out of OE-Core this becomes even harder because then >> BSPs can no longer bbappend clutter or cogl (if that is indeed what is >> required in order to enable machine-specific functionality) without fiddling >> around with BBMASK or keeping the appends in yet another separate layer so >> they don't impact other BSP users who aren't building Clutter. > > The BSPs would not need to do anything regarding clutter, no bbappends, > meta-clutter would be self-contained in this regard. > > I don't think there is any point in bothering the list with this > discussion any further, we have gone around the circle more than once. > The whole point of the proposal was to make maintaining, using and > supporting the clutter packages easier for everyone, but it seems I > underestimated how important Clutter is to oe-core, and I am already > looking forward to this newly discovered importance being translated > into user happiness before too long. :)
I'd prefer we keep meta-clutter working until it happens ;-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
