On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Richard Purdie < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 12:00 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 10 May 2013 11:50, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Or you could replace the shell wrapper that create_wrapper() currently > > > generates with either a compiled binary or a Python script. That would > > > allow you to execl("/path/foo.real", "foo", ...), which I don't think > > > you can do in shell but which would avoid this whole class of problem. > > > > Bash can do that, but it's not POSIX. :/ > > I'm quite happy to have the wrapper as bash shell script. We only need > dash compatibility in things that get run under /bin/sh (i.e. bitbake > shell tasks). > So is there a conclusion regarding this issue? Should the wrapper be kepy as a bash shell script? Thanks, Bogdan > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
