Op 24 feb. 2014, om 17:38 heeft Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven:
> On Monday 30 December 2013 12:59:26 Paul Eggleton wrote: >> On Monday 30 December 2013 09:35:18 Robert Yang wrote: >>> I'm afraid that the standardlinux maybe a little confused with >>> linuxstdbase, bu I don't have any better idea about it. >> >> You could be right. I've thought for a long time about renaming this and >> haven't been able to come up with anything better. On the other hand, in our >> current configuration we are actually using the basic/standardlinux >> packagegroup as part of our LSB images; although that might not be the >> right thing to continue doing - LSB probably ought to be independent. >> >> FWIW, let's consider this particular patch as RFC, maybe someone else has a >> better idea of what to name it. I am very much convinced that "basic" is not >> the right name though. > > So, has anyone got any better ideas for the name of core-image-basic and > packagegroup-core-basic? > > The idea is that these are meant to contain things that you might have on a > more traditional or full-featured Linux system. Somehow "-traditionallinux" > doesn't really work either. Who does it need to contain 'linux'? OE isn't linux specfic and neither are the package groups. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
