On Tuesday 25 February 2014 13:13:24 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 24 feb. 2014, om 17:38 heeft Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > > On Monday 30 December 2013 12:59:26 Paul Eggleton wrote: > >> On Monday 30 December 2013 09:35:18 Robert Yang wrote: > >>> I'm afraid that the standardlinux maybe a little confused with > >>> linuxstdbase, bu I don't have any better idea about it. > >> > >> You could be right. I've thought for a long time about renaming this and > >> haven't been able to come up with anything better. On the other hand, in > >> our current configuration we are actually using the basic/standardlinux > >> packagegroup as part of our LSB images; although that might not be the > >> right thing to continue doing - LSB probably ought to be independent. > >> > >> FWIW, let's consider this particular patch as RFC, maybe someone else has > >> a > >> better idea of what to name it. I am very much convinced that "basic" is > >> not the right name though. > > > > So, has anyone got any better ideas for the name of core-image-basic and > > packagegroup-core-basic? > > > > The idea is that these are meant to contain things that you might have on > > a > > more traditional or full-featured Linux system. Somehow > > "-traditionallinux" > > doesn't really work either. > > Who does it need to contain 'linux'? OE isn't linux specfic and neither are > the package groups.
I'm fully open to alternatives, that's why I brought this up again... Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
