On Mar 31, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>> i dont believe you tested all layer combinations > > I've tested everything I can, as has the autobuilder. I can't offer > any more than this. > >> > >> > >> >> at this point. 3.10 being LTS >> >> I would assume its a better option to keep at 3.10 >> > >> > >> > I disagree, this is consistent with other releases and the documented >> > plan of action. I'd rather not have a massive version jump in the fall. >> >> its probably not a bad option to stick to LTS version for kernel headers >> after all > > Again, I disagree. > > We can maybe keep the 3.10 recipe around, Thats ugly too. We decided to stick to one version of headers last time. > but the default should > be 3.14, we need a matched kernel and libc-headers to get the best integration > and leveraging of the latest features. > > If we pull the headers, pull the kernel. this all is understood, however we have to get better with timings especially changing something like kernel headers whose impact is far reaching then just updating kernel proper.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
