On 14-04-01 02:42 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mar 31, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]>
wrote:
i dont believe you tested all layer combinations
I've tested everything I can, as has the autobuilder. I can't offer
any more than this.
at this point. 3.10 being LTS
I would assume its a better option to keep at 3.10
I disagree, this is consistent with other releases and the documented
plan of action. I'd rather not have a massive version jump in the fall.
its probably not a bad option to stick to LTS version for kernel headers
after all
Again, I disagree.
We can maybe keep the 3.10 recipe around,
Thats ugly too. We decided to stick to one version of headers last time.
but the default should
be 3.14, we need a matched kernel and libc-headers to get the best integration
and leveraging of the latest features.
If we pull the headers, pull the kernel.
this all is understood, however we have to get better with timings especially
changing something like kernel headers whose impact is far reaching then
just updating kernel proper.
We do the best we can and I can only play the timing that is dealt
by the upstream projects ... but we all know that!
We arranged for as much soak testing and building as we could behind
the scenes.
That being said, we are going to introduce the versioned kernel and
libc-headers recipes in the -rc1 timeframe next time around and we
captured that intention on the kernel planning wiki for 1.7 .. so that
should help in the next cycle.
Cheers,
Bruce
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
