> On Mar 16, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Due to libc-dependant conditional patching (which should be completely > forbidden -- fix it properly instead) the last PV bump forgot to adjust > patches so they failed to apply.
Patches are fine in this series, however I just want to set the expectations right here. While having that libc-independent goal is fine. Sometimes we just can not do it, since uclibc or musl does not have all the features that glibc has and an app might also be using it. making glibc users not have those features is unfair given that we have a strong mechanism of overrides in OE, it should be used to this advantage. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
