What is one expected to do when one justs wants to add the missing license to
the "licenses collected for ..."?
I'm a bit spoiled now, most OE messages explain what it expects me to do to
fix the problem.
M.
On 08-05-15 14:39, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi Steffen,
On Friday 08 May 2015 13:07:35 Steffen Sledz wrote:
Since switching from dizzy to fido we've some warnings related to some of
our own closed source packages.
WARNING: log_check: There is a warn message in the logfile
WARNING: log_check: Matched keyword: [WARNING:]
WARNING: log_check: WARNING: The license listed CLOSED was not in the
licenses collected for foo
The recipes contain lines like this one:
LICENSE = "CLOSED"
How should we fix the recipe to avoid the warning?
I think the part of the code that produces this warning probably should be
ignoring the CLOSED value. Can I ask you to please file a bug? Feel free to add
me on CC.
Cheers,
Paul
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Embedded Products
Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
