On 11-05-15 11:36, Paul Eggleton wrote:
At a guess, maybe do_populate_lic didn't re-execute for this recipe. Does it
still happen if you bitbake -c cleansstate the recipe and try again?
Yes, it even complains about this on a completely fresh build.
Cheers,
Paul
On Monday 11 May 2015 10:58:07 Mike Looijmans wrote:
Hmm, I cannot figure it out... I have in a recipe:
LICENSE = "internal"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=cf85de037de7ae12cc2d0059741fdbae"
Then in my layer.conf:
LICENSE_PATH += "${LAYERDIR}/licenses"
I have a file called "internal" in that path. Still, I get:
WARNING: log_check: WARNING: The license listed internal was not in the
licenses collected for ...
What am I missing still then? What does the warning mean? I thought I got
everything right, but either the licensing rules have changed or I never got
it right in the first place and a check was added to make me aware of that.
On 11-05-15 08:54, Mike Looijmans wrote:
What is one expected to do when one justs wants to add the missing license
to the "licenses collected for ..."?
I'm a bit spoiled now, most OE messages explain what it expects me to do
to
fix the problem.
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Embedded Products
Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Embedded Products
Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
