On 4 July 2015 at 12:38, Paul Eggleton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, at minimum for our purposes LGPLv3 (or LGPLv3+?) needs to be added to > LICENSE in the nettle recipe (with &). Whether or not someone chooses to > exclude that license in their configuration through INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE > is a > completely separate matter (and that is, as you allude to, a distinct > license > from GPLv3). > FWIW the YP documentation states to mark GPL LGPL and AGPL v3 in INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE to build a GPLv3 image, on the rationale that the usual clauses that upset people are not specific to the GPL variation. The autobuilder just excludes GPL right now, but there's a bug to fix this. Of course IANAL and the opinion of someone who actually does use INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE to remove GPLv3 software would be appreciated! Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
