* akuster808 <[email protected]> [150702 19:05]: > The current version of nettle 2.7 has one file that is GPL v3. > mini-gmp.*
> so the license for 2.7 should be updated IMHO. So wont that put us in the > same boat as the upgrade? Well, after looking a little bit at the repo in question, my understanding is that all files (well, those few I looked at, including mini-gmp.*) is dual licensed LGPLv3 /or/ GPLv2+, in the current master branch. It looks like this was done 2014-04-12, in 12 commits. So could you double check the 3.1.1 release, and verify whether it only consists of LGPLv3 | GPLv2+ licensed files, or if there actually are any files having the GPLv3(+) restriction? At least the commits from 2014-04-12 suggests that the whole nettle repo was clarified to be dual-licensed as LGPLv3 | GPLv2+ (though there's of course a risk that some files are left untouched). Though, it also suggests that upstream is willing to ensure that GPLv2 compatibility remains as an option. Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
