On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 16:23 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Randy MacLeod >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 2015-09-02 11:55 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Joe Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Implements ifup and ifdown. >> >>> >> >>> Copied from https://github.com/WindRiver-OpenSourceLabs/meta-overc.git >> >>> as of commit aa89eebffe06e4aa04701eae9691cb3049cbaef9. >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think this belongs to meta-networking. Also, what this one provides >> >> which is not provided by the busybox one? >> > >> > We're trying to make busybox optional for larger systems >> > that want to only use the full-featured/bloated packages. >> > It's not a large tax to carry busybox in a 50+ MB image but >> > it would be nice to not require it. >> >> I see; I still think this belongs to meta-networking as it will allow >> this to be done however won't add new recipes in core. >> >> If many people start to use this, we can move this to core. > > To put this another way, I think it is probably reasonable that we > should be able to build an image from OE-Core with basic functionality > like networking without busybox?
That's what I'd support. If everything you need for the functionality with busy box is in oe-core, to me, it doesn't make sense to go outside core to get that same functionality without busybox. Cheers, Bruce > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
