On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>> To put this another way, I think it is probably reasonable that we
>> should be able to build an image from OE-Core with basic functionality
>> like networking without busybox?
>
> That's what I'd support. If everything you need for the functionality with 
> busy
> box is in oe-core, to me, it doesn't make sense to go outside core to get that
> same functionality without busybox.

irrespective of this change. I see yet another configuration with this
into OE-core, overall OE-Core should get smaller
and case does not sound convincing to me. You dont want to use busybox
in a fairly large image which has other GPLv2 software in
it. Thats fine but doesnt look like a common usecase to me
-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to