> On Sep 4, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Burton, Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 4 September 2015 at 16:29, Khem Raj <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > a small nit. Make it 5.% to logically indicate that 5.x is a bug fix release > and next big upgrade will be > 6.x > > To be honest I'd prefer *any* change to the compiler beyond eg 5.2.0 -> 5.2.1 > to be explicit. I think we've all seen enough breakage from a "bug fix" > release to know that it needs a proper test. >
well to put it in simple way gcc has changes its release numbers so 4.9.x is same as 5.x now ( bug fix release) . Does that help > Ross
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
