> On Sep 4, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 08:29 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Sep 4, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Richard Purdie >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> -GCCVERSION ?= "4.9%" >>> +GCCVERSION ?= "5.2%" >> >> a small nit. Make it 5.% to logically indicate that 5.x is a bug fix release >> and next big upgrade will be >> 6.x > > I'm not sure this would be a good idea. We have had 4.8 alongside 4.9 > and can imagine doing something like that with newer 5.x releases > depending on how they work out. I doubt 5.2% hurts anything, apart from > needing to tweak that file slightly more often… >
I was asking so that it gets to people that 5.1 and 5.2 are not major release anymore instead 5.x and 6.x will be major release in future. So there will never be 5.2 and 5.3 simultaneously existing but 5.2 and 6.0 might. So it just reflects the upstream release model change. We can always change the minor as well there is no other technical advantage of using 5.% > Cheers, > > Richard > > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
