On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:13:22AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Maxin B. John <[email protected]> wrote: > > This patch set provides libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg. > > > > libjpeg-turbo is a fork of the original libjpeg project.Most of the major > > Linux > > distros (Fedora, Debian, OpenSUSE) moved from libjpeg to libjpeg-turbo > > recently. > > lbjpeg-turbo provides better JPEG compression/decompression(at least 25% > > faster) > > while maintaining same API/ABI as libjpeg. > > > > Once we reach an agreement on this, based on the decision, we can move the > > libjpeg package to meta-oe for applications which may depend on API version > > 9. > > I support this change, due: > > - agreement with major Linux distros > - performance improvement > > I also think moving libjpeg (API version 9) for meta-oe is fine as > well. I am not aware of any application which requires it, though.
I'm not aware of any as well, so I would prefer to drop libjpeg completely. + less junk in meta-oe + people were confused about multiple jpeg providers before, now they would be again, but without good reason (as nobody knows about apps depending on libjpeg9). -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
