Hi, On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:19:32PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:13:22AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Maxin B. John <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This patch set provides libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for > > > libjpeg. > > > > > > libjpeg-turbo is a fork of the original libjpeg project.Most of the major > > > Linux > > > distros (Fedora, Debian, OpenSUSE) moved from libjpeg to libjpeg-turbo > > > recently. > > > lbjpeg-turbo provides better JPEG compression/decompression(at least 25% > > > faster) > > > while maintaining same API/ABI as libjpeg. > > > > > > Once we reach an agreement on this, based on the decision, we can move the > > > libjpeg package to meta-oe for applications which may depend on API > > > version 9. > > > > I support this change, due: > > > > - agreement with major Linux distros > > - performance improvement > > > > I also think moving libjpeg (API version 9) for meta-oe is fine as > > well. I am not aware of any application which requires it, though. > > I'm not aware of any as well, so I would prefer to drop libjpeg > completely. > > + less junk in meta-oe > + people were confused about multiple jpeg providers before, now they > would be again, but without good reason (as nobody knows about apps > depending on libjpeg9). >
Agree. In this case, I will send a patch to remove libjpeg-turbo from meta-oe. > -- > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected] Best Regards, Maxin -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
