On 11/27/2015 05:53 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
hi,
+Robert.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Alejandro del Castillo
<[email protected]> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alejandro del Castillo <[email protected]>
---
...ng_util-New-file-with-bin_to_hex-function.patch | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++
.../opkg/0002-md5-Add-md5_to_string-function.patch | 110 +++++++++++++++++++
...0003-sha256-Add-sha256_to_string-function.patch | 110 +++++++++++++++++++
...4-opkg_download-Use-short-cache-file-name.patch | 85 ++++++++++++++
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_0.3.0.bb | 4 +
5 files changed, 431 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/0001-string_util-New-file-with-bin_to_hex-function.patch
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/0002-md5-Add-md5_to_string-function.patch
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/0003-sha256-Add-sha256_to_string-function.patch
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/0004-opkg_download-Use-short-cache-file-name.patch
Can this patch be backported to jethro? My jethro builds fail without
it.. I can carry in my layer, but I believe this would be better in OE
core.
If needed, I can prepare and test the patch.
Thanks, fine to me to backport it.
// Robert
thanks
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
