Hi Otavio, On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 02:02:26PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:24:43AM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > >> On 26 January 2016 at 03:34, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > A clean room re-implementation and extension of the original stress tool. > >> > > >> > >> What's the rationale for adding this to oe-core over another layer? > > > > None, besides the original stress is in oe-core. What other layer would you > > suggest? > > I think meta-oe is better; in fact the 'stress' package could go there as > well.
"stress" package was moved from meta-linaro to oe-core as a dependency for rt-tests ptest. > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 Best Regards, Maxin -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
