> On Jan 27, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:20:23AM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:24:43AM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> On 26 January 2016 at 03:34, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> A clean room re-implementation and extension of the original stress tool. >>>> >>> >>> What's the rationale for adding this to oe-core over another layer? >> >> None, besides the original stress is in oe-core. What other layer would you >> suggest? > > Ross, > > Care do make your own suggestion? Do you think meta-oe would be a better fit? > Are there any other considerations, since stress-ng is a replacement of the > original stress and it was added to oe-core? Thanks. >
IIRC we had meta-benchmarking. They all should go there. > -- > Denys > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
