Sorry wrong list again... Still half asleep.
---------------------------------------- > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:58:14 +0000 > Subject: [OE-core] [oe] [PATCH] gpsd: Fix build when static libs disabled > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2016-February/106230.html > >> Fix this build error: >> SCons Error: no such option: --disable-static >> Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john at intel.com> >> --- >> meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb >> b/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb >> index ff268b3..a300595 100644 >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb >> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ EXTRA_OESCONS = " \ >> systemd='${SYSTEMD_OESCONS}' \ >> ${EXTRA_OECONF} \ >> " >> +DISABLE_STATIC = "" >> & this cannot be used, because then chrpath is not found and only static lib >> is built >> & target=${HOST_SYS} >> >> -- >> 2.4.0 > > While this fixes the build, is it just fixing the symptom? > > I have a patch that copies the fix in: > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2016-February/106251.html > > That is: use EXTRA_CONF_PACKAGECONFIG instead of EXTRA_OECONF, as mentioned > the above diff. > > This prevents the option being pulled in in the first place, which ought to > be a more general solution. > > Regards, > Chris > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
