On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:58:14AM +0000, Chris Trobridge wrote: > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2016-February/106230.html > > > Fix this build error: > > SCons Error: no such option: --disable-static > > Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john at intel.com> > > --- > > meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb > >b/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb > > index ff268b3..a300595 100644 > > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-navigation/gpsd/gpsd_3.14.bb > > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ EXTRA_OESCONS = " \ > > systemd='${SYSTEMD_OESCONS}' \ > > ${EXTRA_OECONF} \ > > " > > +DISABLE_STATIC = "" > > & this cannot be used, because then chrpath is not found and only static > >lib is built > > & target=${HOST_SYS} > > > > -- > > 2.4.0 > > While this fixes the build, is it just fixing the symptom? > > I have a patch that copies the fix in: > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2016-February/106251.html > > That is: use EXTRA_CONF_PACKAGECONFIG instead of EXTRA_OECONF, as mentioned > the above diff. > > This prevents the option being pulled in in the first place, which ought to > be a more general solution.
Both changes depend on RFC patch from me: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/116719/ which wasn't commented on yet or merged to at least master-next. Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
