On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:26 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Mariano Lopez <[email protected]> > > It is pointless to archive several times the gcc source. > This change will archive gcc source once, for the gcc-source-{PV} > recipe. > > [YOCTO #9327] > > Signed-off-by: Mariano Lopez <[email protected]> > --- > meta/classes/archiver.bbclass | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass > index b95176b..1546bd0 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass > @@ -61,6 +61,12 @@ python () { > else: > bb.debug(1, 'archiver: %s is included: %s' % (pn, reason)) > > + # We just archive gcc-source for all the gcc related recipes > + if d.getVar('BPN', True) in ['gcc', 'libgcc'] \ > + and not pn.startswith('gcc-source'): > + bb.debug(1, 'archiver: %s is excluded, covered by gcc-source' % > pn) > + return > Hmm, I wonder if it'd be possible to make this more generic, check for work-shared or something.
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
