On 03/24/2016 12:04 PM, Christopher Larson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:26 AM <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:From: Mariano Lopez <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> + # We just archive gcc-source for all the gcc related recipes + if d.getVar('BPN', True) in ['gcc', 'libgcc'] \ + and not pn.startswith('gcc-source'): + bb.debug(1, 'archiver: %s is excluded, covered by gcc-source' % pn) + returnHmm, I wonder if it'd be possible to make this more generic, check for work-shared or something.
I was thinking the same when writing the patch, but it seems gcc is more of a corner case. The only two recipes that use work-shared are gcc and the kernel, the kernel case it's already covered checking for the class "kernel-yocto". In case of gcc we can't check for a class, we would need for work-shared and gcc, and that would be the almost the same comparison as is in the patch.
Mariano
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
