On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 18:32 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 10:37 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > > > Renaming armv8a -> aarch32 is going to affect almost every line in > > the patch. We should probably drop the current patch from master- > > next. > > "AArch32" applies retrospectively to all older versions of the ARM > architecture as well, so it's not obvious to me that a straight > rename > of the existing "armv8a" override to "aarch32" would be the right > thing > either. > > I think the whole approach to ARMv8 and AArch64 in OE needs to be > carefully thought through before we start landing any patches for > that > stuff. We have a tangled enough maze of overrides right now and I > think we should make all efforts to avoid it getting worse.
Agreed, I'm planning to drop the patch triggering this from -next and defer it until 2.2. The discussions can happen in the meantime to get a patchset we're all happy with. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
