> On Mar 24, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 18:32 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 10:37 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> >>> Renaming armv8a -> aarch32 is going to affect almost every line in >>> the patch. We should probably drop the current patch from master- >>> next. >> >> "AArch32" applies retrospectively to all older versions of the ARM >> architecture as well, so it's not obvious to me that a straight >> rename >> of the existing "armv8a" override to "aarch32" would be the right >> thing >> either. >> >> I think the whole approach to ARMv8 and AArch64 in OE needs to be >> carefully thought through before we start landing any patches for >> that >> stuff. We have a tangled enough maze of overrides right now and I >> think we should make all efforts to avoid it getting worse. > > Agreed, I'm planning to drop the patch triggering this from -next and > defer it until 2.2. The discussions can happen in the meantime to get a > patchset we're all happy with.
hopefully we will be able to cherry-pick into 2.1 at later stage ? > > Cheers, > > Richard
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
