On 24/08/2016 02:50, Khem Raj wrote:
On Aug 23, 2016, at 12:25 AM, Jérémy Rosen <[email protected]> wrote:
The autotools class already export most *_FOR_BUILD from bitbake's
BUILD_* variables. Somehow the variable CCLD_FOR_BUILD was missing
At least libpcre uses that variable and will use gcc instead of BUILD_CCLD
to link binaries
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Rosen <[email protected]>
---
meta/classes/autotools.bbclass | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/autotools.bbclass b/meta/classes/autotools.bbclass
index 076899c..9041021 100644
--- a/meta/classes/autotools.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/autotools.bbclass
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ export CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CXXFLAGS}"
export LD_FOR_BUILD = "${BUILD_LD}"
export LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD = "${BUILD_LDFLAGS}"
+export CCLD_FOR_BUILD = "${BUILD_CCLD}”
if its used by just one recipe then its not worth abstracting it out. Perhaps
fixing
https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/blob/master/meta/recipes-support/libpcre/libpcre/pcre-cross.patch
is another option ?
I'll have a look, I have been looking around and i'm not even sure if
CC_FOR_BUILD is an autoconf thing... CCLD seems to be unique to that
recipe. i'll look at the patch
+
def append_libtool_sysroot(d):
# Only supply libtool sysroot option for non-native packages
if not bb.data.inherits_class('native', d):
--
git-series 0.8.9
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
