On 24 August 2016 at 12:28, Jérémy Rosen <[email protected]> wrote:
> ok, so CC_FOR_BUILD seems to be a common convention and CCLD_FOR_BUILD > seems only used by our patch for pcre. Fixing it to use CC_FOR_BUILD for > linking is trivial > > but the patch is marked as submitted upstream, so Fahad... what is the > status ? how can we do that ? > > I can also set CCLD_FOR_BUILD in ther .bb file instead of > autotools.bbclass, that's trivial... the question is whether we should fix > the patch or not... > CC_FOR_BUILD and CPP_FOR_BUILD are de facto standards by virtue of being part of autoconf-archive: https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/ax_prog_cc_for_build.html Looking at the patch wouldn't it be possible to avoid the entire .c -> .o -> binary process and just go from .c -> binary via CC_FOR_BUILD? Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
