On 10/17/2016 02:08 AM, Joshua Lock wrote:
On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:40 -0500,
leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com>

There are two bbtests that just makes sense on certain distros:
test_bitbake_g cannot be done on poky-tiny and test_non_gplv3
just makes sense on poky and poky-tiny. Skip these when
necessary under the latter conditions.

[YOCTO #8525]

Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.in
  meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/bbtests.py | 7 +++++++
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/bbtests.py
index baae1e0..9b11cd9 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/bbtests.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/bbtests.py
@@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ class BitbakeTests(oeSelfTest):
      def test_bitbake_g(self):
+        if self.distro == 'poky-tiny':
+            self.skipTest('core-image-full-cmdline is not buildable
with poky-tiny')
This test is still valid for poky-tiny, it's just that the image the
test builds isn't buildable with poky-tiny, right?

I think it would be better to change the test to a different, smaller,
image that can also be built for poky-tiny (core-image-minimal?).
We'd also need to change the target the test checks for the presence of
in pn-buildlist.
Good idea. Which image and pn-buildlist package check do you suggest?



          result = bitbake('-g core-image-full-cmdline')
          for f in ['pn-buildlist', 'pn-depends.dot', 'package-
depends.dot', 'task-depends.dot']:
              self.addCleanup(os.remove, f)
@@ -229,6 +232,10 @@ INHERIT_remove = \"report-error\"
      def test_non_gplv3(self):
+        supported_distros = ['poky', 'poky-tiny']
+        if not self.distro in supported_distros:
+            self.skipTest('Test considers only %s distros' %
          data = 'INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE = "GPLv3"'
          conf = os.path.join(self.builddir, 'conf/local.conf')
          ftools.append_file(conf ,data)

Openembedded-core mailing list

Reply via email to