On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Jussi Kukkonen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 May 2017 at 10:53, Alexander Kanavin > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 05/09/2017 12:24 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> >>> The development of Wayland does make the long-term prospect of Sato >>> interesting: do we port Sato to Wayland too, or keep the Wayland images >>> using the standard Weston demo shell? >> >> >> There is a third option: find a functional, pretty, lightweight wayland >> shell, and provide that. I think the prime candidate for that at the moment >> is Maynard, but it has its own issues, mainly that upstream isn't really >> developing it anymore. Jussi is OOO this week, maybe he can add his 2c a bit >> later. >> >> https://github.com/raspberrypi/maynard/wiki > > > You pretty much said my 2c: Maynard wouldn't need that much development and > maintenance to be useful as a minimal DE that scales to different devices. > Unfortunately it's not getting the love and care it needs. Writing wayland > compositors/desktops seems to be common pastime so I'm a little sad someone > hasn't picked up Maynard as their hobby project. > > Even if Maynard was maintained it would fill a similar niche as Sato now > does for X: not something we'd especially expect people to ship on products.
some users of OE make SBCs for them having a good light weight DE is desired, thats where XFCE and MATE LXDE LXQT etc fill in since they are light enough and well used in desktop world too, so you get the right fit, other users of OE who do graphics and video dont really use DEs, so they are fine with GL context but there is a shift towards wayland and embedded compositors around wayland since weston is quite generic e.g. see https://github.com/rdkcmf/westeros I am pretty sure one of above DEs will pick wayland at some point but until then we have weston -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
