Dear Holger,
Am Samstag, den 23.01.2010, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Holger Hans Peter Freyther: > On Saturday 23 January 2010 09:43:24 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: […] > I have pushed "holger/staging-branch" to the server. It does contain all > patches from patchwork that are still applying. Please go through the branch > and cherry-pick or follow up on the emails.. if I understood correctly you mean with »patches from patchwork that are still applying« that the mbox file can be applied with `git am` as `pw-am.sh` does [1]. That requires that all patches are submitted using `git send-email`, which has been suggested lately on this list by several people, or that everyone uses a MUA which provides easy handling of mbox files created by `git format-patch`. Is that correct? I will start a separate thread regarding `git send-email`. > I also have a new version of the > program I use attached... I will probably switch it to use pwclient in the > future. Thank you for your effort and bringing up `pwclient`. It is so sad, that there exists a lot of tools and stuff one does not know about which could safe work and time for oneself. I wonder why others projects did not face the same problems yet. Probably every project or developers wrote her/his own scripts (as OE did with `pw-am.sh`) and everyone reinvents the wheel. Thanks, Paul [1] http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Patchwork [2] http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Commit_Policy
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
