-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 23-01-10 17:11, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 13:19 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: >> If it is possible, I suggest to add a new state (»Rejected – Commit >> Policy«) for patches not complying with the commit policy [3]? > > If the patch is basically correct then it seems a little bit officious > to reject it purely because it fails to conform to the commit policy in > some way. Most of the issues listed in the policy are easy enough to > fix up when applying the patch, after all.
And yet OE developers aren't fixing those up (latest example: the patch stack Khem pushed last week), however easy it may be. Maybe it's a case of sampling bias since I only inspect bad commits, but in any case, the commit message of the commits that end up in .dev needs to get improved. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLWzlJMkyGM64RGpERAvyDAKCE7pBD3krfl2wBN4GvYi59Wi+g8wCeLNmA Wg9qotVtOlkyOtLgSkhTrPQ= =ar+b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
