On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 11:24 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> > > --- > > recipes/git/git.inc | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/recipes/git/git.inc b/recipes/git/git.inc > > index 644e159..fd7b708 100644 > > --- a/recipes/git/git.inc > > +++ b/recipes/git/git.inc > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "The git revision control system used by the > > Linux kernel develope > > SECTION = "console/utils" > > LICENSE = "GPL" > > > > -SRC_URI = "http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/git-${PV}.tar.bz2"; > > +SRC_URI = > > "http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/git-${PV}.tar.bz2;name=git"; > > Is there a patch to add checksums in corresponding recipes to use the name? > Or > what is the purpose of adding one?
I guess the idea is to make it possible for new recipes (which use this .inc file) to include their own checksums. Seems like a reasonable enough plan even if the old recipes are not converted. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
