On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 11:24 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > recipes/git/git.inc | 2 +- >> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/recipes/git/git.inc b/recipes/git/git.inc >> > index 644e159..fd7b708 100644 >> > --- a/recipes/git/git.inc >> > +++ b/recipes/git/git.inc >> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "The git revision control system used by the >> > Linux kernel develope >> > SECTION = "console/utils" >> > LICENSE = "GPL" >> > >> > -SRC_URI = "http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/git-${PV}.tar.bz2"; >> > +SRC_URI = >> > "http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/git-${PV}.tar.bz2;name=git"; >> >> Is there a patch to add checksums in corresponding recipes to use the name? >> Or >> what is the purpose of adding one? > > I guess the idea is to make it possible for new recipes (which use > this .inc file) to include their own checksums. Seems like a reasonable > enough plan even if the old recipes are not converted.
Has anyone thought about programmatically injecting a name to the first tarball/zip in the SRC_URI if no sources have that name yet? It seems like adding a name to the primary tarball is becoming common boilerplate, and the common case is for that to be the first source. -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
