-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 29-03-10 23:42, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 10:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> I have had gcc build all runtimes libraries separately. I think we should >> device gcc build and we can disable building certain directories via >> --disable-<dir>. We dont have to stash libgcc. Its not a big library and >> its probably better to rebuild it along with rest of runtime libraries IMO >> and probably we should have packages for each language runtime so people >> who dont need C++ or Java or fortran dont have to build those. The same >> should be tunable in gcc builds too. > > I talked with Khem on irc but just for the record here, I've done some > testing with gcc 4.3.3 in Poky and have pushed my results to: > > http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky/log/?h=master-gcc-runtime-testing > > This adds a gcc-runtime recipe which builds libgcc, libssp and libstdc++ > as test cases. It will be possible to build other runtime libs > conditionally on whether they're enabled like libfortran easily enough.
Can't we have seperate recipes for ssp, stdc++, fortran, java, etc? I don't think we need USEFLAGs for this when we build them seperately anyway. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLscWDMkyGM64RGpERAiGWAKC3DUZnFvM4fiS5+eBj83MMJcLB2wCeOaEW 7qaQ7rDPo+K4cXaoZejxdJY= =o64b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
