-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 30-03-10 11:42, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 11:33 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 29-03-10 23:42, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 10:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> I have had gcc build all runtimes libraries separately. I think we should >>>> device gcc build and we can disable building certain directories via >>>> --disable-<dir>. We dont have to stash libgcc. Its not a big library and >>>> its probably better to rebuild it along with rest of runtime libraries IMO >>>> and probably we should have packages for each language runtime so people >>>> who dont need C++ or Java or fortran dont have to build those. The same >>>> should be tunable in gcc builds too. >>> >>> I talked with Khem on irc but just for the record here, I've done some >>> testing with gcc 4.3.3 in Poky and have pushed my results to: >>> >>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky/log/?h=master-gcc-runtime-testing >>> >>> This adds a gcc-runtime recipe which builds libgcc, libssp and libstdc++ >>> as test cases. It will be possible to build other runtime libs >>> conditionally on whether they're enabled like libfortran easily enough. >> >> Can't we have seperate recipes for ssp, stdc++, fortran, java, etc? I >> don't think we need USEFLAGs for this when we build them seperately anyway. > > We'd not be using USEFLAGS, we'd just be looking at the line which tells > gcc itself which bits to build. Having separate recipes doesn't solve > the problem since we'd still have to work out whether the compiler for a > given lib was built and then we enter a dependency nightmare working out > which packages need which combinations of compilers and compiler libs. > > So we can have separate recipes but think through the issues and see > whether you still like the idea...
Let's put it in a different way: Can we stop artificially limiting the toolchain options and have people opt-out instead of opt-in for stuff? I really need a full featured toolchain :) regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLsc8gMkyGM64RGpERAspvAJkBUOMCqc6Z4hB7eU0lmzRGStBHBQCglZw/ CDixQmIv66vduo4Yoi2SQGk= =dIFy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
