On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:45 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > There's two uglies here. Ugly one, above. Quoting isn't nice to read > and gdb/gcc/binutils are special. It does however, work from the > get-go. And the only cases it doesn't get right, right off the bat are > some perl (and possibly python) module cases where we aren't giving the > right relative path there, but we can always figure it out and fix that > up per recipe. Ugly two, the chrpath way. Depends on having a big > enough RPATH in the initial binary to patch over. Doesn't work if the > RPATH isn't long enough as you say, which is why you can't do it on > -cross.
I've done the maths and it will always work within the sysroots/staging directory as there is always enough length available. Since we want rid of /cross/ for various reasons anyway I don't think this is a reason against this approach. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
