On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:09 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:45 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > There's two uglies here. Ugly one, above. Quoting isn't nice to read > > and gdb/gcc/binutils are special. It does however, work from the > > get-go. And the only cases it doesn't get right, right off the bat are > > some perl (and possibly python) module cases where we aren't giving the > > right relative path there, but we can always figure it out and fix that > > up per recipe. Ugly two, the chrpath way. Depends on having a big > > enough RPATH in the initial binary to patch over. Doesn't work if the > > RPATH isn't long enough as you say, which is why you can't do it on > > -cross. > > I've done the maths and it will always work within the sysroots/staging > directory as there is always enough length available. Since we want rid > of /cross/ for various reasons anyway I don't think this is a reason > against this approach.
What do you want to do on nativesdk ? That's where this gets real important as well. -- Tom Rini <[email protected]> Mentor Graphics Corporation _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
