2010/7/8 Phil Blundell <[email protected]>: > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 08:49 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> The only concern I have is the name COMPATIBLE_TARGET >> for me TARGET is the board so COMPATIBLE_TARGET for me more or less >> equates to COMPATIBLE_MACHINE. >> What about COMPATIBLE_ARCH or COMPATIBLE_ARCHITECTURE? > > I think the variable that you want to match against (in the specific > case of cross.bbclass) is ${TARGET_SYS}. Having the matching variable > be named COMPATIBLE_ARCH would imply that it's going to match > ${HOST_ARCH}, which obviously isn't what you want. > > I would have thought that confusion with ${MACHINE} should be minimal > since that nomenclature is already quite well established in OE. But > you could name it COMPATIBLE_TARGET_SYS if you wanted to make the name > completely explicit. > Patch posted. I named it COMPATIBLE_TARGET_SYS and compare with TARGET_SYS. Tested it, and for me it works like a charm.
However just after posting I noticed we also have TARGET_ARCH. I'm a little bit lost wrt the differences between these. Let me know if I need to move to *ARCH Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
