2010/7/11 Phil Blundell <[email protected]>: > On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 18:19 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> This patch introduces COMPATIBLE_TARGET_SYS >> It is similar to COMPATIBLE_MACHINE but where COMPATIBLE_MACHINE >> is used to specify that a certain recipe is for a certain machine >> COMPATIBLE_TARGET_SYS can be used to specify that a certain recipe >> is for a certain architecture. >> >> Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> > > I think this should go in cross.bbclass, not base.bbclass. Other than > that it looks fine. >
I have no real preference for location. The only reason for putting it in base.bbclass is because that file also contains the tests for COMPATIBLE_MACHINE and COMPATIBLE_HOST. (as my pythonese is not that good I just copied/pasted/edited/tested there) Please advice Wrt the clarification of khem in the other thread: What about adding a COMPATIBLE_TARGET_ARCH test too ? (actually I think that that is the one I would like to use at one place (although ofc it is quite possible to use COMPATIBLE_TARGET_SYS). (e.g. gblic has arch specific sysdeps, I would like to specify if a version of glibc does not specify my arch). Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
