В сообщении от Понедельник 12 июля 2010 22:34:48 автор Khem Raj написал:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Roman I Khimov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Where each applet is installed as a tiny binary linked against shared
> > libbusybox.
> 
> may be it should be a DISTRO_FEATURE in OE

Well, I don't think so. First, it doesn't change anything functional, only the 
way busybox is linked/installed/packaged and second is that it only affects 
one package, so if distro wants that, I think it should maintain its own 
defconfig (at least four distros do that already and IMO busybox is the 
package you want to tune for your specific needs). Or the distro itself may 
choose not to use busybox at all so such FEATURE would make no sense in that 
case.

I view FEATUREs as a way to make distro-global configuration, ipv6 is probably 
one of the best examples as it potentially affects many packages. 
FEATURE_INDIVIDUAL is completely busybox-specific.

-- 
 http://roman.khimov.ru
mailto: [email protected]
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to